Underlying (source) module does not follow naming convention and advice
See, for example:
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-LevelPin0_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-DirPin0_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-LevelPin1_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-DirPin1_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-LevelPin2_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-DirPin2_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-LevelPin3_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-DirPin3_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-LevelPin4_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-DirPin4_RBV
RFQ-010:RFS-ED-001:IOExp-LevelPin5_RBV
Not only is the postfix incorrect (-RB
for readback, -SP
for setpoints), but most if not all PVs produced appear to be internal (and should thus be prefixed with a #
symbol to not be discovered by channelfinder).